Holt, county sued for advisory letter

By Tim Dana, Staff Writer
Published on Tuesday, September 3, 2002 10:00 PM MST

Judith Armijo has filed a lawsuit against Graham County and Graham County's Superior Court Judge R. Douglas Holt because she claims Holt directed a Gila County judge to illegally close her business.

"A superior court judge has no authority, implied or otherwise, to close a legal business within the community and preclude an individual to make an honest living," Armijo said in the complaint she filed.

Armijo filed the civil complaint June 10 saying her civil rights had been violated, she experienced financial loss and had to seek mental counseling because of Gila County Judge Edward Dawson's decision to close her business.



Dawson heard her case Dec. 10, 2001, because Holt stepped down from the case due to a conflict of interest, but he sent Dawson a letter advising him to forbid Amijo to practice law.

Dawson had sentenced Armijo to three years probation, two months of jail, 360 hours of community service and she must pay back more than $23,000 she stole from Sunshine Apartments and Duncan Heights from March 1999 to April 2000. He did not allow her to continue her paralegal business in Graham County without Holt's approval.

Armijo told Dawson that after she got out of jail she would try and start her paralegal business again. Her jail sentence started Jan. 14, 2002.

In her complaint, Armijo said Holt stated that she was under investigation by the State Bar of Arizona for the unauthorized practice of law. But she claims the bar denied an investigation.

"Because the lawsuit is pending, I prefer not to make any comment at this time," Holt said.

Armijo was unavailable for further comment.

Holt stepped down from the 2001 case because he was on the Graham County Rural Housing Development Board that hired Armijo as executive director of the Rural Housing Development Association.

He did, however, preside over the pre-trial hearing.

Comments

No comments posted.

WRITE A COMMENT

READER COMMENTS
* Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

* Be relevant. Keep your comments pertinent to the story that is being discussed.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The Eastern Arizona Courier is not liable for messages from third parties. IP addresses can be subpoenaed and your identity established by individuals who have been hurt by your comments.

We ask that you not post:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity: You can be prosecuted for identity theft.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in www.eacourier.com reader comments represent the individual's own views and not those of the Eastern Arizona Courier. The Courier does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than Eastern Arizona Courier spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   



More Enhanced Listings >>

Classifieds