"We think it's an awful plan," Dan Hoffman, director of the coalition said. "It's really a bad deal from our perspective."
Hoffman said the Roadless Area Conservation Act of 2001 was a widely popular idea that is now being destroyed by the Bush administration.
|
|
Hoffman said the roadless rule only applies to 10 percent of national forest land in Arizona, leaving 90 percent of the land open to road construction and motorized access.
He said these small pockets of roadless lands need to be protected to preserve the ecosystem and to preserve the quality recreational activities those areas supply.
Hoffman said he doesn't believe the claim that paving roadless areas would reduce the threat of wildfires.
"Large roadless areas, in my mind, allow us to use fire and let fire do its work," Hoffman said. "It's in the areas adjacent to communities where you have problems, and that's why there is not a need right now to build roads in roadless areas to reduce fuel loads. Where there is a strong need is in these areas adjacent to communities."
Hoffman said the Forest Service has traditionally allowed roadless areas to burn, reducing their threat to communities.
Also, because these areas are allowed to burn, Forest Service officials can steer the fire into the roadless areas without having to worry about threatening any structures.
"Large roadless areas have a track record of being the areas where wildfires are allowed to burn," Hoffman said.
"They don't have homes and roads and campgrounds and the facilities that come along with having a roaded area that you're required to protect.
"There is not a need -- right now -- to build roads in roadless areas to reduce fuel loads."
Graham County Super-visor Mark Herrington said it is unlikely the changes to the Roadless Rule will have a large impact on Mount Graham.
"Where roads are, roads are, and there's not many more roads you can build," he said. "Most of the mountain is so steep in topography that you can't have a road up there."
Still, Herrington said he approves of what the president is doing.
He is not happy with federal mandates that prohibit what can be done with certain parcels of land.
"Tying up all this ground and never building another road is absurd," he said. "When the federal government steps in and makes these mandates -- these edicts they give us -- it just impairs what we're trying to do."
There are places on the mountain where there are too many trees and too much debris that needs to be cleaned up, Herrington said.
Bringing in industry to help in those efforts is an idea he likes.
Herrington said there is not enough money to return the forests to healthy levels, and the timber industry can be used to help.
The governor's office has been contacted for comment numerous times since July 22 but had not returned phone calls by press time.
The plan will be open to a 60-day public comment period that will run through September.
To contact Greg Jones, call 428-2560 (ext. 234) or e-mail him at gjones@eacourier.com.

Comments
13 comment(s)Tricia Wenzl wrote on Sep 20, 2008 4:32 PM:
ciara wrote on Jul 17, 2008 9:06 PM:
Warnar Moll Amsterdam The Netherlands wrote on Jul 14, 2008 11:20 AM:
In literature there are many scientific indications that the preparation of the sacred liquid (Haoma),could not contain a Hallucinogen-Entheogen drug (cf publications of Harry Falk, Jan Houben, Frits Staal and the late Mary Boyce).
As a plant-physiologist and toxicologian, I did some study about the preparation of Parahom (as described in Avesta). From the scientic point of view it is impossible that the sacred drink is hallucinogen.
I do not understand the arguments of the Pima's Church of Cognizance.
It is as stupid as the assert: Jesus used Marihuana. "
tom wrote on Apr 19, 2008 3:15 PM:
F THE SYSTEM!!! wrote on Feb 14, 2008 9:15 AM:
LaVae McClellan wrote on Feb 5, 2008 1:51 PM:
joe tapia wrote on Dec 9, 2007 8:05 PM:
JOE TAPIA wrote on Dec 9, 2007 12:11 AM:
Katelynn Nichols wrote on Dec 7, 2007 5:34 PM:
Stephen wrote on Nov 30, 2007 8:57 AM:
SMSmom wrote on Nov 9, 2007 12:11 PM:
Keisha wrote on Oct 27, 2007 8:03 PM:
linda wrote on Oct 26, 2007 11:59 AM: