Will Wright, Graham County planning and zoning director, said the purpose of the study was to examine road deficiencies and make recommendations for improvements.
Officials from the Arizona Department of Transportation and consultants from Parsons Brinkerhoff presented the results of the transportation study Thursday in the Graham County General Services Building.
|
|
About two dozen area residents attended the open house meeting, which featured maps and traffic projections. Attendees could ask questions about the study and submit comments that will be considered when a regional plan is submitted to the state for approval.
Consultant Jennifer Love said the traffic projections were based on the existing networks of roads.
The roads that are at capacity are Eighth Street, Relation Street and Highway 70. In 2013, the traffic flow on Highway 70 will improve due to scheduled work; however, Eighth Avenue and First Avenue will be at capacity, according to the study.
Unless work is done to increase the traffic capacity on local streets and roads, several other thoroughfares will be over capacity by 2018, the study maps show. Those roads and streets include Swift Trail, Quail Trail, Cienega Lane and Stockton Road. The study also states that Lone Star Road will be at capacity by 2018.
The study identified traffic patterns, population areas, employment estimates and related issues, Wright said. The objective of the study is to aid in developing a guide to future planning for a variety of transportation modes.
Recommendations from the study will be incorporated into a regional funding plan.
According to statistics presented at the meeting, about 34,000 people live in the study area, and 10,000 of them are employed. Graham County’s biggest employers are Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, the Eastern Arizona College, the Mount Graham Regional Medical Center, the Safford School District and the Arizona State Prison-Safford.


Comments
32 comment(s)cross rhodes wrote on Aug 28, 2008 12:20 PM:
Sometimes a little road work would be done just before an election.
But don't credit Mr Long. Given the stakes in this past election, don't you think some direction came from those with something to loose?
So why did the residents of safford have to go 8 million dollars in debt to fix something the previous long term members of the council never fixed? "
State of the Union wrote on Aug 27, 2008 2:19 PM:
cross rhodes wrote on Aug 27, 2008 8:12 AM:
back when talley defeated green the first time he promised to repair the roads or don't you recall? you should. look in the Courier archives.
Even Ragland that old seat warmer promised to fix the roads but didn't come through.
huey simply raised taxes (went into $8 million in debt) to fix what should have been cared for within the budget each year. "
State of the Union wrote on Aug 26, 2008 12:34 AM:
armchair engineer wrote on Aug 25, 2008 1:26 PM:
Wrong way wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:30 AM:
Jill R. wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:46 AM:
Wrong Way wrote on Aug 19, 2008 9:27 AM:
armchair engineer wrote on Aug 19, 2008 9:17 AM:
and what about light rail from Lone Star to Pima? The railroad sure doesn't use that track all the time. "
riverrat wrote on Aug 18, 2008 2:29 PM:
Mr. Furious wrote on Aug 17, 2008 2:58 PM:
Road King ADOT wrote on Aug 17, 2008 10:27 AM:
Wrong Way wrote on Aug 17, 2008 9:18 AM:
Gunn wrote on Aug 17, 2008 7:48 AM:
Verbal Kint wrote on Aug 16, 2008 11:48 AM:
Charles wrote on Aug 16, 2008 10:42 AM:
Wrong Way wrote on Aug 16, 2008 9:54 AM:
armchair engineer wrote on Aug 15, 2008 2:18 PM:
why hasn't Stasiak thought of that? "
Gus Hansen wrote on Aug 15, 2008 2:07 PM:
I'm not advocating growth, but to not plan for it only makes the problems that you see in the Gila Valley today worse tomorrow. I love the Gila Valley. The problem with the small town/big town debates is that it makes everybody seem like they think they're "entitled"... I say push for the type of community you want to have, but don't act like you're the only stakeholder in the community. "
Former Fan wrote on Aug 15, 2008 12:34 PM:
Verbal Kint wrote on Aug 15, 2008 9:13 AM:
B.A. Barracas wrote on Aug 15, 2008 9:09 AM:
cjg wrote on Aug 14, 2008 9:03 PM:
Gus Hansen wrote on Aug 14, 2008 2:46 PM:
To "togus", I quite understand that the first commenter's tone was sarcastic... and directed at some imagined motive in the story to keep the Gila Valley a "small community". This suggests he either has no comprehension of the article or that he has an axe to grind about the small town sentiment that some in the Gila Valley hold. Humor has nothing to do with it... "
Jennifer Lover wrote on Aug 14, 2008 1:59 PM:
Makes no sense wrote on Aug 14, 2008 1:33 PM:
Casual Observation wrote on Aug 14, 2008 9:53 AM:
Casual Observation wrote on Aug 14, 2008 9:52 AM:
The next two roads (2013) to be "at capacity" (8th and 1st Ave) are both yet again in the City of Safford (and one is a state highway)
Q: Where are the BOS?
Q: Where was Pete Stasiak and what's his plan to solve this matter? "
to gus wrote on Aug 14, 2008 6:15 AM:
PimaTwo wrote on Aug 13, 2008 2:07 PM:
"Future Growth" now that statement is truely funny. Fortune Tellimg for Graham County. It just don't get no gooder. Maddam Zorba is alive and well! "
Gus Hansen wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:27 AM:
This article has nothing to do with people wanting the Gila Valley to remain small forever. It has everything to do with planning for expected future growth. "
NO wrote on Aug 13, 2008 10:07 AM: