The Quaintances are due to be sentenced by a federal judge within the next two months but are hopeful an appeal will keep them out of prison, according to the Arizona Daily Star.
The couple pleaded guilty to conspiracy with intent to distribute 200 pounds or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of marijuana, and possession with the intent to distribute 100 pounds or more of a substance containing a detectable amount of marijuana, as well as aiding and abetting.
According to a Border Patrol report, Danuel stated, “I am the head of my church, and I have the right to have that marijuana.”
The Quaintances assert they should be exempt from the federal regulation against possession of marijuana due to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. The act states the government needs to justify any action that would substantially burden people from practicing their faith. Danuel says marijuana is essential to his religious beliefs.
“For us, the marijuana is the protector, provider and teacher, promoting good thoughts, good words and good deeds,” he told the Courier in 2006. “None of that is harmful to the health or safety of society in general.”
A church in New Mexico, the Brazil-based Uniao do Vegetal, received an exemption from the United States Supreme Court based on the RFRA for its use of dimethyltryptamine (DMT) in a sacramental tea. DMT is listed as an illegal psychedelic drug by the United States government.
American Indian churches have had a federal exemption for religious use of peyote for years. The American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 protects the traditional religions of the American Indian, Eskimo, Aleut and Native Hawaiians. The act was amended in 1994 to specifically include “the use, possession or transportation of peyote for bona fide traditional ceremonial purposes in connection with the practice of a traditional Indian religion.”
U.S. District Judge Judith Herrera rejected the Quaintances’ argument that their church’s marijuana use should be protected by the RFRA. In her judgement Herrera wrote, “The court concludes that (the) defendants do not sincerely hold a belief that marijuana is a sacrament and a deity. Defendants cannot avoid prosecution for illegal conduct simply by transforming their lifestyle choice into a ‘religion.’”
Danuel said after the court dismissed their religion defense, they decided to plead guilty because they knew they would be convicted at a trial, according to the Star. An appellate court will revisit the Quaintances’ religious argument.



Comments
339 comment(s)D.B. Cooper wrote on Oct 9, 2008 7:33 PM:
OH MY MY wrote on Oct 8, 2008 4:29 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Oct 6, 2008 5:38 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Oct 6, 2008 5:22 PM:
D.B. Cooper wrote on Oct 6, 2008 1:21 PM:
Billy1 wrote on Oct 6, 2008 11:33 AM:
Annoyed wrote on Oct 4, 2008 11:17 AM:
Annoyed wrote on Oct 4, 2008 11:11 AM:
14 days wrote on Oct 1, 2008 10:10 PM:
STOP it now. "
Anna D. wrote on Oct 1, 2008 12:17 PM:
RIGHT,they only keep track of legal things, like the MMJ LAWS that these states have on RECORD. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 30, 2008 1:38 PM:
Sorry to inform you, but if I remember right, Alcohol consumption was not a question asked before I got motorist insurance. They checked my driving record to see if I have had a DUI, but just like Alcohol, you also get DUI if you are smoking pot and caught.
As far as stats on Accidents involving Alcohol and accidents involving Marijuana, I'm not sure the study has been done. BEING THAT MARIJUANA IS ILLEGAL USE USE NO MATTER WHAT STATE YOU ARE IN!!!! Federal Law trumps STATE Law. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 29, 2008 8:50 PM:
R.C., Yes, California has insurance companies that insure mmj people. Some of these people drive, they almost all live somewhere. Insurance companies have the stats, believe me. Where have you been these past few years? California considers mmj LEGAL, and YES these folks get insured. i contend that the stats are favorable for mmj folks, THAT's why the govt isn't screaming its head off about it. People CAN use mmj responsibly, even religious folk. "
Frank wrote on Sep 29, 2008 9:30 AM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 28, 2008 2:29 AM:
What search. First off, since marijuana is ILLEGAL to use, why would the insurance companies conduct a study of the use of an illegal substance and how use of it affects driving. The studies about alcohol are because alcohol is a "Restricted" substance. It is legal to consume if you are of age. Marijuana is ILLEGAL to use.
State law does not trump federal law. Ask all the "Dispensaries" that have been shut down in California after the FEDERAL government siezed their property. "
zzzzz wrote on Sep 27, 2008 10:04 AM:
Anna d. wrote on Sep 27, 2008 8:44 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 27, 2008 8:05 AM:
If i caught my kids playing cannibal, i'd be horrified, but some promote that every week in church. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 26, 2008 11:00 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 26, 2008 10:31 PM:
Russ wrote on Sep 26, 2008 4:47 PM:
TO THE COURIER wrote on Sep 26, 2008 4:13 PM:
jodis wrote on Sep 26, 2008 1:26 PM:
I enjoy reading your logic, which is understandable. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 26, 2008 10:34 AM:
I'm not trying to say that Alcohol is better than Marijuana. If it were up to me, DUI should have a higher penalty than they currently have. If Alcohol was outlawed, it would not change my life one bit.
What I am trying to say is that there is no positive use for Marijuana. People claim it has medical purposes for cancer patients, yet the American Cancer Society doesn't even recognize it.
It is illegal to use, and until the potsmokers band together to change that law, they should obey it. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 25, 2008 7:02 PM:
Sorry, Pot smokers and "Haoma Ritualists" like you are the only ones denying the adverse effects of Marijuana. Motor skills are impared like alcohol does, and the effects of Marijuana last longer from a single "High".
Here are some studies for you.
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2008/09/25/20080925inmates0925.html
37 percent of inmates tested positive for marijuana
Male violent offenders were more likely than female offenders to test positive for marijuana
urinalysis results showed higher rates of drug use among those diagnosed with a mental illness than in those not diagnosed with a mental illness "
HEMP ME wrote on Sep 25, 2008 4:54 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 25, 2008 12:50 PM:
I'm assuming that if the info was negative, that the govt would be spreading that info far and wide. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 25, 2008 12:39 PM:
Check out the NORML site for some of the road study info. "
Russ wrote on Sep 24, 2008 9:13 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 24, 2008 5:28 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 24, 2008 4:48 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 24, 2008 4:09 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 24, 2008 2:26 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 24, 2008 2:25 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 24, 2008 1:56 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 24, 2008 1:35 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 24, 2008 1:06 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 24, 2008 12:52 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 24, 2008 12:40 PM:
Our religious practice is not a buisness, we make no money from it. That is why we qualify (we seek not the wealth of this world) for a public defender. During E.C.Dan&Mary's detention a warrent was issued to search their monestary for money, large amounts of sacrament and records of sells. None exist thus none were found. does that answer you question? Marijuana is Harmless, can we all say harmless? "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 24, 2008 12:05 PM:
I'm sorry that my words have been heated and derrogatory, but I do not agree with your church. I do not condone Illegal Drug use. Watching lives get torn apart and witnessing the crime that goes hand in hand with drug use is what has made my mind for me. You both seem to be sincere, but you have to admit that if Marijuana is legalized for Religious use, there will instantly be new formed churches just to distribute Marijuana and to hide other bad intentions. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:55 AM:
Do I agree with Medical Marijuana Use? Doctors currently can't decide so I say NO. And so does the American Cancer Society. "
ecdj wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:27 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:15 AM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:05 AM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 24, 2008 10:32 AM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 24, 2008 9:19 AM:
Is there a tracking of amounts of "Herb" that is obtained and a distribution of those amounts?
I ask because in this case, we have Dan and Mary arrested for over 300 lbs (Both vehicles combined). Is there a ledger stating that so much was used on so and so day? Because it would be pretty convenient to be able to claim you are transporting for the religion when you are caught, but there is no tracking that the Marijuana was actually used for Religious ceremonies. "
Russ wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:47 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:04 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:12 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:03 PM:
About Kripner's record: the prison system's failure to rehabilitate him, now that is a shame. He's lied to the church, he's lied to the judge. Well, what can i say. She chose to believe him over any other church member or even Pruitt's or Mack's testimonies. "
ecdj wrote on Sep 23, 2008 7:57 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 23, 2008 4:56 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 23, 2008 4:56 PM:
And because of this, when I see your church, which is caught transporting Marijuana across state lines, using a convicted criminal as a "Authorized Transport Agent", I just see more drug addicts getting their vices fed. Not a church hauling thier sacrament. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 23, 2008 4:54 PM:
Reality Check, that sounds like the scenario of most christian chruches' creations. You will have to do better. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 23, 2008 4:51 PM:
I promise you, I'm not Mr Kripner. And I will not be giving my name on a message board. My reverend reference is from the Articles I have recently read about your branch of the COC in Hawaii.
I admit, I know very little about your religious texts, and your church. But from what I have read so far, I believe that your beliefs are wrong. You obviously don't need me to believe it either. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 23, 2008 4:46 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 23, 2008 4:17 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 23, 2008 3:56 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 23, 2008 3:55 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 23, 2008 3:51 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 23, 2008 3:48 PM:
I don't see how you think I am afraid of something.
Jesus taught to be forgiven you must ask for forgiveness. That means the Budhist that used to drink, comes to church, prays for forgiveness, takes the sacrament and is forgiven. But his/her prayers have to be sincere.
But in the COC's idea, instead of asking for forgiveness, they "Adjust" the religion to fit their current vices. They smoke pot, the read a religios text, they change said religious beliefs to fit with their habit, and create a "Neo-Zoroastrian" ideology. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 23, 2008 3:39 PM:
No, because he "Should" admit that drinking to drunkenness is a sin. But if that same person decides to make the Church of Alcohol where a bunch of alcoholics gather and drink until they are puking, that isn't a church. It is an excuse to drink by trying to claim it is religion. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 23, 2008 3:02 PM:
Who says that god doesn't like us inhaling herbs? My god doesn't mind. Why is the C.O.C.'s beliefs affecting Reality Check like this? What is RC afraid of? "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 23, 2008 1:59 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 23, 2008 1:48 PM:
My name will be great among the nations, from the rising to the setting of the sun. In every place incense and pure offerings will be brought to my name, because my name will be great among the nations," says the LORD Almighty.
Luke 1:11
Then an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing at the right side of the altar of incense.
Revelation 8:4
The smoke of the incense, together with the prayers of the saints, went up before God from the angel's hand. "
ecdj wrote on Sep 23, 2008 1:35 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 23, 2008 1:34 PM:
Fred wrote on Sep 23, 2008 1:23 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 23, 2008 1:20 PM:
Why are you so afraid of poppies, etc? For centuries people have grown and used these substances. So after thousands of years of humans evolving with these plants, NOW it is evil? SAYS WHO? The guys that dug the artifacts out of the temples say CANNABIS was used in ritual, not just the C.O.C. GET OVER IT "
ecdj wrote on Sep 23, 2008 1:01 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 23, 2008 11:34 AM:
Sorry, but saying your church is a farse is not a hate crime.
I will conceed that Marijuana is less potent compared to the damage that other drugs can cause. But just because you like to use a less hurtful drug does not give you the right to BREAK THE LAW.
And unfortunately, even though you don't believe it, MARIJUANA IS A GATEWAY DRUG. Not all pot heads use Meth, but nearly all Meth addicts have or still use Pot. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 23, 2008 11:23 AM:
And as for giving a name on a message board, you are Pretty insane to do so. Sorry if I tend to not believe you when you are posting messages and claiming to be a "Reverend" from a COC church in Hawaii.
Want me to give you a name, how about Timothy Kripner. Friends call me Tim but I would prefer you call me Mr. Kripner. It took an arrest for hauling their sacrament to realise their lies. Now I can actually turn my life around." "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 23, 2008 11:02 AM:
I can accept it. Just as I accept that god made Poppies, and Cocoa leaves and "Ephedra". God made Hops and Barley, and tobacco.
Just because god made marijuana does not make it righteous to smoke and inhale the fumes.
You may cite the righteous tennants of Zoroastrian beliefs, but that does not give truth to your idea that Marijuana is Haoma.
The fact that most (if not all) of your members smoked pot before joining is proof the church is fake. "
Fred wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:50 AM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:38 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:23 AM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:13 AM:
The Supreme Court wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:41 AM:
Russ wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:27 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 22, 2008 9:20 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 22, 2008 8:48 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 22, 2008 8:43 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 22, 2008 8:08 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 22, 2008 8:05 PM:
Inquiring minds want to know wrote on Sep 22, 2008 6:22 PM:
Inquiring minds want to know wrote on Sep 22, 2008 6:17 PM:
Do you really have to practice incest to be a Zoroastrian (only marry other zoroastrians)? How did Zoroastrianism start if not through incest, if only those born in Zoroastrianism can be members?
Where in the Avesta does it say how a person can declare themselves a member? "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 22, 2008 6:06 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 22, 2008 5:45 PM:
Come on, reality check, WHO? Neither YOU nor the judges nor the dea will convince me that I am insincere, nor that the church is insincere. Are you sure that you aren't here arguing in order to justify to yourself, the way that you treat other human beings? Is your conscience crying out for help/forgiveness? Have you hurt a dirty hairylegged hippy before? Do you need spiritual counselling? "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 22, 2008 4:39 PM:
"In my religion nobody needs to die for anybody else... and we can still attain paradise. WHAT A CONCEPT!"
Your religion has been around for 17 years (1991). And now the founder's of the church are going to jail. Sounds like your religion is gonna disappear because it was a farse to try to smoke pot and call it religion.
And don't go trying to say your religion is thousands of years old. Zoroastrianism is thousands of years old, they worship fire, not Marijuana and they don't let converts into their church. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 22, 2008 4:32 PM:
Sorry, but smoking a toxic chemical to trick your brain into feeling euphoric is not "Evolving Spiritualy". It is using drugs to escape REALITY!!! People who are truely spiritual do not need mind altering drugs to "Worship" god.
As for loving your fellow man, good for you, but you need to stop feeding other people's vices by falsely saying it is good for you.
In the end, you all will find out that you have spent your life defying god just to be a pothead. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 22, 2008 3:53 PM:
"you sense that you just may be less evolved spiritually and intellecually than others around you and it makes you mad."
Sorry, wrong again. I have witnessed first hand how a person goes from the occasional pot smoker to other harder drugs. I have seen meth addicts that tried Meth one time because they were out of Pot and it was cheaper. It's funny, but even in this church, you can't separate the criminal element from the drug user. Even the Church's transport agent had prior convictions for other than Pot Possession. "
ecdj wrote on Sep 22, 2008 2:51 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 22, 2008 2:28 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 22, 2008 2:23 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 22, 2008 1:29 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 22, 2008 12:12 PM:
"Every christian is taught that it is because Jesus died for the sins of this world, that all sins may be forgiven."
But to be forgiven, you have to admit to your sins and ask for forgiveness. Unlike the COC, if a christian is a pot smoker, if they admit to it and stop doing it, they can be forgiven. But the COC refuses to admit that using a DRUG is a sin. They went so far as to actually change an existing religion into the Marijuana Church. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 22, 2008 12:04 PM:
"You see We make a drink from the seeds and flowers of this plant which is called Haoma and is a complete meal"
Then explain Dan's picture on his web site where he is obviously lighting up and smiling. (It is next to his mission statement).
Like I said, don't appear to be a pot head and people probably might consider the idea that you are not a pot head. "
ecdj wrote on Sep 22, 2008 11:06 AM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:58 AM:
"No, let me guess, you'll resort to the standard 'intelligent' "hippies" comment."
Have you actually looked at Dan and Mary's web site?
Let's just say that if you want to convince people you are not just hippies wishing to legalize your drug preference, you should SPELL CHECK YOUR MISSION STATEMENT!!!
I mean, how can you expect to convince people that you have studied the true plant that is referenced as Haoma and comprehend ancient religious texts on the subject if you can't write a mission statement without multiple "VIOLANCE" and "EXCIST" references. "
ecdj wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:30 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 22, 2008 8:17 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 22, 2008 7:55 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 22, 2008 7:47 AM:
I am wrote on Sep 22, 2008 6:43 AM:
I am wrote on Sep 21, 2008 10:25 PM:
Fmr Catholic wrote on Sep 21, 2008 9:28 PM:
jodis wrote on Sep 21, 2008 9:28 PM:
Fmr Catholic wrote on Sep 21, 2008 9:22 PM:
Good wrote on Sep 21, 2008 3:43 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 21, 2008 12:49 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 21, 2008 11:20 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 21, 2008 11:07 AM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 21, 2008 11:03 AM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 21, 2008 9:25 AM:
hippie cluck wrote on Sep 21, 2008 8:46 AM:
Russ wrote on Sep 21, 2008 8:27 AM:
Russ wrote on Sep 21, 2008 8:22 AM:
Fred wrote on Sep 20, 2008 11:48 PM:
Facts for all wrote on Sep 20, 2008 11:12 PM:
Fred wrote on Sep 20, 2008 10:15 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 20, 2008 8:47 PM:
I am wrote on Sep 20, 2008 7:06 PM:
Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2006.
It is said the drink was provided at funerals as a soother of grief. Compare; "The herb was used in India in cultural and religious ceremonies, and recorded in Sanskrit scriptural texts around 1,400 B.C. Cannabis was considered a holy herb and was characterized as the "soother of grief," "the sky flyer," and "the poor man's heaven." "
Fred wrote on Sep 20, 2008 6:58 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 20, 2008 1:34 PM:
UNDER GOD, not equal to or above.
Give unto Caesar...would't that translate as:"Govts want their money back, give it to them. Dont' use it." i didn't notice god makin money in the creation story. But herbs were GOOD. "
ecdj wrote on Sep 20, 2008 12:33 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 20, 2008 12:11 PM:
jodis wrote on Sep 20, 2008 11:38 AM:
jodis wrote on Sep 20, 2008 11:35 AM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 20, 2008 11:25 AM:
I am wrote on Sep 20, 2008 8:40 AM:
Do you not see that whatever goes into a man from outside cannot defile him, since it enters, not his heart but his stomach, and so passes on?” And he said, “What comes out of a man is what defiles a man. For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, fornication, theft, murder, adultery, coveting, wickedness, deceit, licentiousness, envy, slander, pride, foolishness. All these evil things come from within, and they defile a man” "
I am wrote on Sep 20, 2008 8:39 AM:
I am wrote on Sep 20, 2008 8:38 AM:
(Proverbs 10:12) Hatred stirs up strife, but love covers all offenses.
(1 Peter 4:8) Above all hold unfailing your love for one another, since love covers a multitude of sins. "
I am wrote on Sep 20, 2008 8:37 AM:
(Romans 13:8) Owe no one anything, except to love one another; for he who loves his neighbor has fulfilled the law.
(Romans 13:9)The commandments, "You shall not commit adultery, You shall not kill, You shall not steal, You shall not covet," and any other commandment, are summed up in this sentence, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself."
(Romans 13:10) Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfilling of the law." "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 20, 2008 12:39 AM:
"paying money to the private comany/mofia/irs wouldn't be the christian thing to do in my opinion"
Matthew 22 17-21
17) ...Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?
18) But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?
19) Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.
20) And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription?
21) They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's "
Dave wrote on Sep 19, 2008 8:23 PM:
Fred wrote on Sep 19, 2008 5:53 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 19, 2008 5:35 PM:
The scholars of the COC are "not" the Parsi, our scholars are the "keepers of the knowledge" of our church. We did not create Zoroastrianism, Haoma or the ancient practice of good thoughts, good words and good deeds, we only understand to practice and worship them correctly.
Marijuana "IS" the ancient Haoma of the Zoroastrians like it or not, that's up to you and the Parsi as well. "
jodis wrote on Sep 19, 2008 5:30 PM:
jodis wrote on Sep 19, 2008 5:27 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 19, 2008 5:12 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 19, 2008 4:49 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 19, 2008 4:39 PM:
The COC was made up in 1991 by potheads to further their pot smoking agenda by claiming it was covered under the 1st amendment. The judge saw otherwise. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 19, 2008 4:23 PM:
If this Marijuana was purchased using church proceeds, which are given as a charitable deduction, there is a Big IRS problem for the church.
Or have they been acting as if they are not a church and not filing income statements as a tax free entity?
Because not claiming the tax free status is like admitting that they are not a real church. "
ecdj wrote on Sep 19, 2008 3:50 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 19, 2008 2:47 PM:
Fred wrote on Sep 19, 2008 2:23 PM:
jodis wrote on Sep 19, 2008 1:32 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 19, 2008 12:17 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 19, 2008 11:54 AM:
As far as things go with you "Fred", Jesus said "cast not your pearls before swine" you are the swine he was talking about. I am truly surprised you can even talk with the limited amount of brain cells your working with. It appears that there are a few in here that would prevent sick and dying people any margine of relief, twisted hateful people is all that you are. PEACE. "
Fred wrote on Sep 19, 2008 10:51 AM:
Enough wrote on Sep 19, 2008 7:57 AM:
jodis wrote on Sep 18, 2008 6:23 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 5:49 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 5:02 PM:
Religous cannabis costs about what it takes to water it. We've been over this before. "
Fmr Catholic wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:22 PM:
Reality Check: "Are you trying to claim that Marijuana use somehow stimulates Alertness and awareness?"
Amen, Reality Check! That's why they never get the stuff legalized: It makes people lazy! "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:21 PM:
GOGO wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:20 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:19 PM:
I have literally looked in to this church for a total of an hour. And I have found holes in your beliefs in regards to Marijuana Use. What do you think a Prosecuting Attorney with dedicated paralegals will find. Your claim of use for religious purposes is going down.
I'm guessing that the church receives some sort of offerings (Money, tithes) from members. There could be a large monetary problem when it comes out that the money gathered was used to purchase an illegal drug. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:17 PM:
Fmr Catholic wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:14 PM:
Fmr Catholic wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:10 PM:
Fmr Catholic wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:09 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:09 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 3:55 PM:
Do you think that govt perferred one religion over another, when alcohol was illegal and they'allowed it' for sacramentlal use, but not for cannabis or dmt? Oh, wait, the supreme ct said that dmt was okay for sacrament... "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 3:44 PM:
Reailty Check wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:56 PM:
You have made the choice to use Marijuana instead of Ephedra and that makes you a POT CHURCH instead of a Zoroastrian Church. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:50 PM:
Notice that Marijuana and THC are both on the Schedule 1 list. That makes them ILLEGAL no matter if your "Reformed" church has changed Ephedra to Marijuana.
Also, notice that Ephedrine, Ephedra, of PseudoEphedrine are not on this list. The combination of chemicals that create "Meth" is on there, but not the plant Ephedra which your religious text refers to as Haoma. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:45 PM:
And as I pointed out earlier:
Per the Yasna Haoma stimulates alertness and awareness (Yasna 9.17, 9.22, 10.13)
Are you trying to claim that Marijuana use somehow stimulates Alertness and awareness?
And 30 minutes may not make a religious scholar, but that same 30 minutes found some pretty big holes about how MARIJUANA is not used in the church you claim to be part of. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:35 PM:
Sorry, but per the DEA Drug Scheduling List of Schedule "1" substances:
Tetrahydrocannabinols
DEA# 7370
Classified as a narcotic
Other names: THC, Delta-8 THC, Delta-9 THC and others
I figured you would know this being it is the Substance your church used for worship. Maybe that is why you are in the situation you are currently in. "
Fred wrote on Sep 18, 2008 1:31 PM:
Russ wrote on Sep 18, 2008 1:03 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:36 PM:
do you know of any other medicine that can make that claim? NO! for a hundred years reports have been made on the effects of marijuana on society as a whole and the individual physically and mentally. Not "ONE" of these reports recommended prohibiting or criminalizing it's use. Those reports have been ignored, no longer. "
jodis wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:11 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:04 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:53 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:53 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:19 AM:
Danuel Q. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:59 AM:
After a careful review of the available evidence about the risks and benefits of ephedra in supplements, the FDA found that these supplements present an unreasonable risk of illness or injury to consumers. The data showed little evidence of ephedra's effectiveness, ...while confirming that the substance raises blood pressure and stresses the heart. http://nccam.nih.gov/health/alerts/ephedra/consumeradvisory.htm "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:58 AM:
Cannabis sacrament and ritual is central to our religion. Like i said, the church is not going door to door 'pushing' ideas on anyone. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:30 AM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:16 AM:
Danuel Q. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:07 AM:
Danuel Q. wrote on Sep 18, 2008 6:46 AM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:23 AM:
Funny, you claim that Ephedra is a Schedule 1 substance, yet it isn't on the list????? Now I hope you know that "Meth" is made from "Ephedrine" which is taken from a legal over the counter drug called "Sudufed" (That's why stores keep it locked up in the back now). The actual Ephedra plant (which contains 1-3% Ephedrine) is not a controlled sustance. But MARIJUANA DEA# 7360 (a Narcotic) is a Schedule 1 substance. So is Tetrahydrocannabinols DEA# 7370 (The active ingredient in Marijuana). "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 18, 2008 3:59 AM:
And you wonder why the judge said you guys are full of ****. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 18, 2008 3:56 AM:
Luke 21:9
9 But when ye shall hear of wars and commotions, be not terrified: for these things must first come to pass
Luke 22:36
36 And He said to them, “But now, let him who has a purse take it along, likewise also a bag, and let him who has no sword sell his robe and buy one.
Like I said, Jesus did not say you should die at the hands of your enemies rather than to oppose with force. "
Fred wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:17 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 17, 2008 10:15 PM:
People in many religions have forgotten their older ways. One famous christian religion's founder was darn near burned at the stake for heresy. He survived just to turn around and advocate burning people at the stake. Another christian sect recently got around to apologizing for LOTS of old traditions. Sometimes it takes centuries to accept truths like gravity. "
Danuel Q. wrote on Sep 17, 2008 10:08 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:57 PM:
Danuel Q. wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:54 PM:
Danuel Q. wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:50 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:49 PM:
Danuel Q. wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:44 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:38 PM:
Fmr Catholic wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:33 PM:
Former Catholic wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:23 PM:
Also, not defending the catholics, but believe me, no one's getting drunk off what what's called "wine" at mass. It's very weak,you only get a sip and smart people don't wanna drink it because of germs! YUCK! Just want people to get the facts straight. "
ecj wrote on Sep 17, 2008 5:51 PM:
Russ wrote on Sep 17, 2008 5:09 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 17, 2008 4:51 PM:
Jesus promoted love for your fellow man, but he did not say you should die at the hands of your enemies rather than to oppose them with force.
And Zoroastrian text doesn't condone the use of Marijuana. It talks of a completely different "Plant" as being Haoma. "
ecdj wrote on Sep 17, 2008 4:45 PM:
jodis wrote on Sep 17, 2008 4:28 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 17, 2008 4:11 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 17, 2008 3:54 PM:
Fred wrote on Sep 17, 2008 3:02 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 17, 2008 1:42 PM:
am I right? I sense a pain in you and a frustration with no end, you might not realise it but we have that much in common if nothing else. take care, be well and good luck. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 17, 2008 1:30 PM:
"There is no need to look for a plant other than Ephedra, the one plant used to this day by the Parsis." (Falk 1989)
I guess these Zoroathian Scholars are just idiots and don't know the true use of marijuana. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 17, 2008 1:07 PM:
"Zoroastrianism is nothing new, it is very old, yet it still hangs on. Most 'traditional' Zoroastrians insist that only those born into or married into the religon can BE Zoroastrian."
I take it that you are from India, or Iran then? Or your spouse is?
Per the Yasna (Zoroastrian text) Haoma stimulates alertness and awareness (Yasna 9.17, 9.22, 10.13)
And all historians claim that the only plant that resembles Haoma is not Marijuana but Ephedra. Which was banned as a medical remedy by the FDA in 2004 because of ephedra-related deaths. "
ecdj wrote on Sep 17, 2008 12:26 PM:
Fred wrote on Sep 17, 2008 12:24 PM:
Fred wrote on Sep 17, 2008 12:12 PM:
Russ wrote on Sep 17, 2008 12:01 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 17, 2008 10:48 AM:
Peace be with you. Sincerely, Anna "
jodis wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:44 AM:
Russ wrote on Sep 16, 2008 8:29 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 16, 2008 5:44 PM:
The Chuch of Cognizance doesn't have a president/king/ruler or pope. We have a councle which directs church affairs and conducts the churches programs. also, I am not a hula teacher though I wish I were. I do however understand what it is for someone to give their heart completely, with honor and with respect for that which they deem as sacred. Sadly I have also experienced that it is usually the people who have no such understanding/love or respect that throw most of the stones.
at others. "
Concerned wrote on Sep 16, 2008 3:28 PM:
Fred wrote on Sep 16, 2008 2:50 PM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 16, 2008 12:27 PM:
jodis wrote on Sep 16, 2008 11:41 AM:
judis wrote on Sep 16, 2008 11:34 AM:
Blessings to You and to All. "
jodis wrote on Sep 15, 2008 6:25 PM:
And by the way, I'm totally hip. I can't do the hula very well, but I can sure jazz it up in jazzercise class. haha "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 15, 2008 6:04 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 15, 2008 5:55 PM:
Rasta wrote on Sep 15, 2008 5:29 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 15, 2008 5:13 PM:
Anna D. says:Gosh, i hope that you weren't in any way involved with Dan and Mary's arrest. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 15, 2008 5:02 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 15, 2008 4:53 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 15, 2008 3:52 PM:
"Are 'sinners' OKAY in churches if they only become sinners AFTER they join?"
People sin before they join churches. But for the most part, to truely follow the church, they have to give up their sinful ways. Alcoholics have to stop drinking. Drug users have to "OBEY LAWS" and stop using drugs.
In this church, you have Pot smokers (Which is illegal) that join a church that condones pot smoking. They did not give up sin, they joined because the church allows their sin. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 15, 2008 3:40 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 15, 2008 3:32 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 15, 2008 3:17 PM:
...and anyway, i have to wonder if there would BE ANY churches if 'sinners' were not allowed to join. I'm pondering the logic. Are 'sinners' OKAY in churches if they only become sinners AFTER they join?
come on, help me out here,'reality check', TELL this church how to set some sort of religious policy. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 15, 2008 3:17 PM:
"You appear to know more about Kripners police record..."
http://www.supreme.state.az.us/
You can look up anyone through 150+ arizona courts.
"... then the CoC did and the "federal prosecuters office" did during the proceedings nonetheless..."
I can't deny that prosecutors overlook blatant facts to get a conviction.
And my question goes to the basis of this church. Do you have pot heads looking to legitimize their actions, or actual people who believe in a faith that happens to believe pot is sacred. Pretty convenient for the previous pot smoker. "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 15, 2008 3:03 PM:
If I happened to be a leader of a church that believes a substance was a sacred part of worship. Knowing that the substance was currently illegal to possess, I wouldn't endanger my congregation by sending them out to haul weed with a laminated card. I would take the responsibility of aquiring the religious materials myself and not endangering my congregation.
You have to admit that when the church's supply is hauled by a guy convicted of prior drug and other crimes, it looks bad for the church. "
ecdj wrote on Sep 15, 2008 2:40 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 15, 2008 2:35 PM:
For many thousands of years, mankind used herbs (which god said was 'good'.) Who are you to say otherwise? "
Concerned wrote on Sep 15, 2008 2:32 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 15, 2008 2:28 PM:
...and the beat goes on. Point your finger, you have several pointing back at yourself? "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 15, 2008 1:33 PM:
Did he join the church and start using pot, or did he use pot and join the church?
I wonder when they are gonna make a Church of Jelly Donuts? I need to be with MY PEOPLE. "
ecdj wrote on Sep 15, 2008 1:25 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Sep 15, 2008 1:17 PM:
Few churches run criminal background checks. But fewer churches ask their congregation to run "ILLEGAL" drugs for them.
Threats and intimidation
Disorderly Conduct
Interfering with Judicial Proceedings
Failure to Appear in court
These are all crimes that show the true "Character" of the person they chose to run their drugs. If they are helping to turn Kripner's life around, then why endanger his progress by having him haul their Sacred plant? I mean, Kripner loved the chuch so much he testified against them. "
jodis wrote on Sep 15, 2008 10:57 AM:
LDS not LSD wrote on Sep 15, 2008 10:50 AM:
Anna d. wrote on Sep 15, 2008 9:40 AM:
Was it something i said?
(I also hope that you aren't using one of those little girls' confiscated computers...) "
Jay wrote on Sep 15, 2008 7:31 AM:
ecdj wrote on Sep 14, 2008 9:52 PM:
Duhh wrote on Sep 14, 2008 8:32 PM:
One more thing, you degrade all indigenous peoples with your racist remarks while you are extremely more ignorant than any of those people could possibly be. It is on the shoulders of giants that we stand to attain greatness. You should be more thankful "
ecdj wrote on Sep 14, 2008 7:18 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 14, 2008 6:19 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 14, 2008 6:08 PM:
Chong wrote on Sep 14, 2008 5:27 PM:
Cheech wrote on Sep 14, 2008 4:27 PM:
bwana wrote on Sep 14, 2008 3:55 PM:
I'd also like to add that I have serious misgivings about a society that allows people like Fred into law enforcement. He sounds like someone that regular people need to be protected from! "
Reality Check wrote on Sep 14, 2008 3:47 PM:
3/11/2003
Shoplift
Poss Marijuana
Poss paraphernalia
Failure to Appear (FTA)
7/23/2003
Threats and intimidation
FTA
12/8/2003
Interfere with Judicial Proc
1/5/2004
Interfere Judicial
Poss Drug Para
4/13/2004
Disorderly Conduct
FTA
4/20/2005
Poss Marijuana
Poss Drug Para
And multiple other drug possession charges. The official drug courier for the church that has a track record of multiple law violations other than drugs. "
Still disgusted... wrote on Sep 14, 2008 2:17 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 14, 2008 9:52 AM:
Is harm coming to the C.O.C.?
A question for you is, has society evolved enough to have the religious tolerance (perfect religous tolerance)that our country held to be of such importance? "
Joint wrote on Sep 14, 2008 8:14 AM:
LOSERS wrote on Sep 14, 2008 7:58 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 13, 2008 11:18 PM:
send em wrote on Sep 13, 2008 8:52 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 13, 2008 7:52 PM:
Why is it that everybody wants to know my name and nobody will tell me the compelling interest? "
Pot Man wrote on Sep 13, 2008 7:32 PM:
Duhh wrote on Sep 13, 2008 6:03 PM:
Jerry wrote on Sep 13, 2008 4:53 PM:
Better yet, Anna D.(if that is your real name), run for office and attempt to change the way the "Russ'" of the world feel about legalizing or decriminalizing the possession of and use of Marijuana.
As for Russ; Crawl back into your bottle of Gin, Whisky, Rum, Vodka or whatever you happen to be drinking tonight. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 13, 2008 4:24 PM:
jodis wrote on Sep 13, 2008 3:28 PM:
Fred, just curious, what did you do at the jail? Jailer, maintenance man or maybe you actually graduated to cafeteria worker. Bless your heart, you have a one track minded mind with extremely narrow tunnel vision. "
jodis wrote on Sep 13, 2008 3:24 PM:
Duhhh wrote on Sep 13, 2008 3:07 PM:
disgusted with Anna wrote on Sep 13, 2008 1:28 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 13, 2008 10:13 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 13, 2008 10:04 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 13, 2008 9:46 AM:
Russ, please explain your 'poll' remark, then. Perhaps it will give me more insight as to your reasoning approaches. "
Fred wrote on Sep 13, 2008 12:25 AM:
Fred wrote on Sep 13, 2008 12:22 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 11:42 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 11:26 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 11:13 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 9:01 PM:
but for the sake of pondering your question...There are several countries where it IS legal, they are doing fine.
There are a dozen states that seem to be working out their mmj laws pretty well, DESPITE federal interference. I'm not sure what you mean by legal. "
Russ wrote on Sep 12, 2008 8:45 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 8:44 PM:
But, i plead with you not to draw the line at a lie. If cannabis is safer than alcohol, then do you need to think about drawing the line so that it eliminates alcohol as sacrament, too? "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 8:34 PM:
compelling interest, that is where it ends. What do you think govt's compelling interest IS, in prohibiting a safer substance than alcohol or the UDV's sacrament? "
jodis wrote on Sep 12, 2008 8:10 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 4:53 PM:
My first job was in the field of law enforcement. Later, became a teacher. Retired now, helping to raise a couple of grandkids. Heh, 'hippified', i like that. "
TG wrote on Sep 12, 2008 4:51 PM:
You have to draw a line somewhere, and I think the line shouldn't budge. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 4:39 PM:
Fred wrote on Sep 12, 2008 3:14 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 2:16 PM:
The church would like to practice its religion in peace and aid the sick and dying. The practice of this religion is causing no harm. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 2:09 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 1:58 PM:
Personally, i would like to see the church members doing less prison ministry and doing more to help the sick and dying, in genreal. "
send em wrote on Sep 12, 2008 12:59 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 12:10 PM:
Frank wrote on Sep 12, 2008 12:09 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 12, 2008 11:55 AM:
You are insinuating that the members of the church do not work? The last poll that i saw, had 'users' in the lower to mid 70 percentile. That would be like 3/4 of the population. Cannbis use crosses all societal lines, which would mean that all sorts of workers are/have been mj users. That would include doctors, lawyers, pharmasists, dentists, truck drivers, teachers, and those who clean out sewers or are unemployed or disabled.
Nobody from the church is trying to convince you to use. "
REALLY wrote on Sep 12, 2008 11:42 AM:
Lets Get High wrote on Sep 12, 2008 10:56 AM:
I am willing to bet that they will indead smoke their dope as soon as they get locked up.
What a joke.
OUR SYSTEM "
Fred wrote on Sep 12, 2008 9:55 AM:
jodis wrote on Sep 12, 2008 8:56 AM:
Rational Thought wrote on Sep 11, 2008 10:27 PM:
You are approaching the slippery slope from the wrong direction. You should not ask how many meth users started out with pot, because that logic can extend to things like tobacco, alcohol, even air! How many meth users have drank alcohol or breathed air before? Probably 100%.
The real question should be how many marijuana users ended up using meth ,vs how many marijuana users stopped at marijuana. That is the problem with the "gateway drug" argument the way it's commonly presented. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 7:47 PM:
E.C.D.J. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 7:03 PM:
If you believe that depriving people the right to practice their religion in America is ok, I think that speaks for itself. The Federal Law doesn't need to be changed it needs to be observed by the DEA. Marijuana does-not qualify under federal regulations as a schedule I drug as of 1996 at which time it's medicinal use was first observed in California,U.S.A.. It was the DEA's job to reschedule it then but guess what? they didn't! so... your point? E.C.D.J. "
E.C.D.J. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 6:46 PM:
wouldn't like it if someone accused you
of being a member of a Reigion only to justify the wageing of war against other cultures & people of color would you? or that your statements are just a covert form of insulting any people and beliefs that don't bow down to yours. Of course you won't come out and say that you are an imperialist (your to smart for that)yet i'll bet you'll be voting for McCain for a change in Washington,lol. your bud E.C.D.J. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 6:29 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 6:24 PM:
the us supreme ct in gonzales v oregan interpreted section 903 of the controlled substances act (in 2006), that it is the states determined medical practices, not the federal govt. AND to be a schedule one substance it has to have no accepted use in any state. and dan and mary were charged with possession of a schedule one substance, towit marijuana. Mj is no longer a legal controlled substance. dea just has not done their job in removing it. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 6:05 PM:
mind your manners, please. "
Russ wrote on Sep 11, 2008 5:48 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 5:23 PM:
Thanks for the rational discussion,Russ, i don't usually find such manners in such matters, people get so fueled up over religious issues. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 5:07 PM:
E.C.D.J. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 5:02 PM:
wouldn't like it if someone accused you
of being a Christian in order to wage war against other cultures & people of color now would you? That in fact your statements are just a covert cover to justify striking down the people and beliefs that don't bow down to yours, with not only words but with deadly force if needed, right? Of course you won't come out and say that you are a racist/nazi/imperialist (your to smart)yet that is what you have been doing and what you appear to be2me. E.C.D.J. "
Russ wrote on Sep 11, 2008 4:24 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 3:14 PM:
They have, perhaps older, yet similar 'Tree of Life' scriptures as the bible and other scriptural/historical writings. These Zoroastrians/Mazda-worshipers also freed the hebrews from Babylonia and paved their way back to the holy lands and even were supportive of rebuilding the temple. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 3:08 PM:
The church lifestyle of using the sacrament is well within the religion's 'scope and sequence'. Dan and Mary are exemplary examples of this branch of Zoroastrianism.
You still avoid my questions... "
Fred wrote on Sep 11, 2008 2:53 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 2:27 PM:
Russ wrote on Sep 11, 2008 2:12 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 1:51 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 1:39 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 1:30 PM:
The last survey that i saw said 72% used marijuana, and 76% appouved of mmj. Az voted a couple of times, the will of the people who are probably not happy that the taxpayer is paying. Good thing, cuz its a poor church and important issue. "
Russ wrote on Sep 11, 2008 1:21 PM:
Russ wrote on Sep 11, 2008 12:36 PM:
Fred wrote on Sep 11, 2008 12:32 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 11:25 AM:
Are you aware that cannabis is not even scheduled properly? The fact that even having ONE state that provides for medical cannabis, that cannabis doesn't meet the scheduling at all? That would make the gestapo-like tactics of the dea ILLEGAL ever since California made cannabis medical law. And now there are about a dozen states that have medical marijuana laws. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 11, 2008 11:11 AM:
I'm sorry about that, but see what you are saying?
We COULD live in peace. This religion is not invading your home against your will.
If the govt. decided to actually endorse cannabis in all its various functions and YOU do not believe in cannabis use at all, should the govt then treat you with swat teams,guns and dogs? "
Jack Herer wrote on Sep 11, 2008 10:37 AM:
Jack Herer wrote on Sep 11, 2008 10:34 AM:
Jack Herer wrote on Sep 11, 2008 10:30 AM:
Russ wrote on Sep 11, 2008 10:26 AM:
Fred wrote on Sep 11, 2008 10:06 AM:
jodis wrote on Sep 11, 2008 9:37 AM:
blindguy wrote on Sep 11, 2008 8:19 AM:
bwana wrote on Sep 11, 2008 5:55 AM:
Russ wrote on Sep 11, 2008 1:39 AM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 10, 2008 11:33 PM:
I'm not really sure what you mean by that. Does this mean that you would rather bow to the govts whims than do what your religion mandates? Ok.
I say 'govts whims', in this case, only because cannabis was not always 'illegal', in fact it was grown openly and endorsed by the govt. Kids worked the fields.
Govt gets pretty brutal with their whims, tho. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 10, 2008 11:20 PM:
...and Dan and Mary have a choice on whether or not to give the "thc" at sacrament, too. They've turned away insincere adults. There are special reassuances in the pledge of the church concerning minors. "
Anna D. wrote on Sep 10, 2008 10:03 PM:
Az law insists on PERFECT TOLLERENCE of religion. The US constitution says something about that, too. The UDV decision had also just been made. Religious Peyote is legally tollerated. Dan and Mary have had personal religious experiences with Haoma/cannabis, including healings. They have archeological evidence of sacramental Cannabis in the temples and homes of Bactria/Margiana, the area where the prophet Zoroaster is said to have died.(as well as other evidences that Haoma is cannabis)...and Haoma is central to Zoroastrian ritual. "
Russ wrote on Sep 10, 2008 9:05 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 10, 2008 8:08 PM:
In their religion, a very old religion which still exists, (they didn't make this up), it is those who hamper the religious use of Cannabis who will be cursed by the Creator. "
Out of Thatcher wrote on Sep 10, 2008 7:40 PM:
Anna D. wrote on Sep 10, 2008 6:59 PM:
There is nothing 'horrible' about cannabis, except the results of the war on it that this country wages daily. Cannabis is safer than sugar.
Many many more meth addicts started out using alcohol in church.
Evil? God made cannabis and said that it was for our 'meat'. WHO would be against that? WHO is the evil one? "
wow wrote on Sep 10, 2008 6:31 PM:
Good wrote on Sep 10, 2008 10:41 AM: