Looking at the births posted in the Courier recently, I was shocked to see that only four of 14 births that week were to parents with a common last name.
Acknowledged is the fact that some married women retain their maiden names. I spent some time on the Internet and found the following information.
National rates were less than 4 percent in the 1940s, 5 percent in the 1960s, 18 percent in 1980 and 40 percent in 2007.
We should be deeply concerned about our children’s future because studies find that children born out of wedlock, as compared to those raised in the traditional family, have a higher high school dropout rate, end up being poorer, have more behavioral and psychological problems, are more likely to be subjects of the criminal justice system, have lower self esteem and tend to follow the social mores of their parents. On average, these children are disadvantaged.
The impact of illegitimacy is also very costly on society as a whole. Last year, of the 665 births at Mount Graham Regional Medical Center, 326 (49 percent) were out-of-wedlock births paid for by AHCCCS. At the conservative figure of $5,000 per birth (doctor and hospital charges), these local out-of-wedlock births cost taxpayers a minimum of $1,630,000 in 2008. Imagine the statewide and national costs of out-of-wedlock births paid for by taxpayers. National health care may need overhauling, but obviously this lifestyle needs changing.
Future generations will, as a whole, pay a terrible price, both economically and socially, because of our generation’s tolerance of an expensive lifestyle that handicaps children. For the sake of future generations, it behooves parents, clergymen, educators, medical personnel, public servants and private citizens to work together to discourage out-of-wedlock birthing.
Eldon Angle
Safford



Comments
148 comment(s)Come on now wrote on Jul 26, 2009 4:33 PM:
Shaesca wrote on Jul 25, 2009 9:18 AM:
AHCCCS wrote on Jul 24, 2009 7:27 PM:
“think” you want to live in. "
AHCCCS wrote on Jul 24, 2009 7:26 PM:
D.O. wrote on Jul 24, 2009 3:02 PM:
my opinion wrote on Jul 23, 2009 11:56 AM:
Holy Crap wrote on Jul 22, 2009 3:56 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Jul 22, 2009 1:35 PM:
There are many people that are in loving relationships, starting a family and not married. But unfortunately, they are the exception and not the norm. The norm is a single mother that needs the government to provide financially to keep her "Family" afloat.
And it doesn't help that many of these same "Good" families are only staying unwed so that the mother can qualify as a single "Low Income" mother for financial help. 49% of single mother AHCCCS births proves this point. "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 22, 2009 1:30 PM:
Why people are getting in to other's business is that the choice to start an out of wedlock family is many times a financial burden on the taxpayers
AHCCCS is intended to be temporary but 49% of all births were to single mothers on AHCCCS. The need for AHCCCS to deliver them is a sign of financial irresponsibility. AHCCCS isn't a right, it's a charity intended to help the needy. It's not intended to sustain the perpetually poor. "
Offended wrote on Jul 22, 2009 11:08 AM:
Ingorance wrote on Jul 22, 2009 10:01 AM:
Good Grief People wrote on Jul 22, 2009 9:08 AM:
The Ladies Man wrote on Jul 21, 2009 1:32 PM:
Dr. Luv wrote on Jul 21, 2009 1:17 PM:
Moved from Safford wrote on Jul 21, 2009 11:17 AM:
Gus wrote on Jul 20, 2009 11:25 AM:
2) Nobody's saying all single parents do a horrible job, but statistics (and logic) say it's tougher to provide a child with all the "necessary" tools when you're in that situation.
3) Learn some responsibility, and stop blaming everything on the government. The government should not be your nanny.
4) The LDS church is not forcing you to do anything. Grow up, you babies! "
Now hear this wrote on Jul 19, 2009 8:59 PM:
MOTHER OF MANY wrote on Jul 19, 2009 4:06 PM:
MOTHER OF MANY wrote on Jul 19, 2009 4:04 PM:
MOTHER OF MANY wrote on Jul 19, 2009 4:01 PM:
marriedmother wrote on Jul 19, 2009 8:58 AM:
Shaesca wrote on Jul 18, 2009 12:13 PM:
Nit Picker wrote on Jul 17, 2009 2:25 PM:
It's burden, not "burdone". "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 17, 2009 1:10 PM:
"I WAS A YOUNG TEEN MOM SINCE I WAS 12 AND MY DAUGHTER IS A SMART GIRL"
I am glad your daughter is a smart girl, but you claimed you didn't get help from no one. At 12 years old? What job did you get at 12 years old? Or did your parents shoulder the burdone? You DEPEND on your parents to take care of your kid and then claim you got NO HELP. To me, it sound like you are still an ungrateful kid. "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 17, 2009 1:01 PM:
"a child born to a single parent via tax dollars doesn't equal disadvantage"
More often than not, an AHCCCS kid born to a single mother is disadvantaged. And they are a burdone to the taxpayers. Choosing to have unprotected sex when you can't take care of a child is a bad choice. And raising a kid to "Do as I say, not as I do." is a losing battle. It's not impossible, but stats show that many single parents fail at changing the cycle. "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 17, 2009 11:48 AM:
Solutions:
Parent Accountability. How about make it embarrassing to have to lower yourself to accept state aid? It should be embarrassing to get AHCCCS and Food Stamps because you have FAILED as a parent. But it isn't.
Food Stamps are on a "Bank Card" now instead of the embarrassing paper slips used like cash.
Set Restrictions and enforce them. You don't fix your situation, you get your kid taken away and adopted out to a financially secure couple that wants to adopt. "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 17, 2009 11:33 AM:
The education is not aimed to teach how disadvantaged a kid is when born to a young mother. And all examples to kids, be it from tv ("16 & Pregnant" on MTV) or from peers getting WIC and AHCCCS. Is not showing teen pregnancy in a negative light. Those programs you claim are supposed to be temporary, they are not. They are PRIMARY means of income and support. And single mothers on Welfare are giving birth to future single mothers on welfare. "
oooh La La wrote on Jul 17, 2009 9:12 AM:
LegalWise wrote on Jul 17, 2009 6:22 AM:
ouch wrote on Jul 16, 2009 6:53 PM:
ohhhhhhh. wrote on Jul 16, 2009 6:43 PM:
DOUG GRANT
Born to loving morman parents.
Peach of a guy this one....... "
WHATEVER wrote on Jul 16, 2009 3:27 PM:
SO DONT JUDGE TO QUICK !!!!! "
Monica wrote on Jul 16, 2009 9:56 AM:
A. The education IS NOT there, i grew up in the Gila Valley area. Abstaining was taught even as we had a senior preggo fr an inmate! B. President Roosevelt intended welfare as a temporary means to help people back on their feet. C. The shame in abadoning a child is NOT there (again, LACK OF EDUCATION & MORALS). Instead of FLAMING every comment, how about an actual solution. Your comments come off as RUDE & inciteful. If ur not part of the solution ur part of the problem "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 16, 2009 12:06 AM:
"Start teaching, stop scaring and lying to the kids and make comdoms available."
You say this as if Condoms are under lock and key in a bank vault. Anyone can by them at Wal-Mart.
The state programs make a teen mother have $0.00 financial burdone to have a kid. There are "alternative" schools in Phoenix that cater to teen mothers so they can have flexible school schedules. Nevermind the added "Attention" that the expecting teen mother gets from her peers.
The "fear" is not there. "
OkAY FOR REAL wrote on Jul 15, 2009 10:59 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Jul 15, 2009 1:28 PM:
How about some born to Single Mothers
Saddam Hussein
Born to a single mother, raised by his uncle.
Stanely "Tookie" Williams III
Born to a 17yo Single mother
Founded the Crips Gang
Executed for 4 murders.
Stanley "Little Tookie" Williams IV
Convicted of 2nd Degree murder.
David Koresh (Waco Texas Cult)
Born to a 14yo Single mother.
Killed in a standoff with ATF and FBI.
David Berkowitz (Son of Sam)
Born to Single Mother Betty Broder who gave him up for adoption.
That list goes on and on too "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 15, 2009 12:48 PM:
Exception to the Rule,
Toni DeBruler-Mata,
Secure and Single,
And others
Your situations are Exceptions. 49% of all births in the local hospital were to single mothers and paid for by the state instead of by private health insurance or their own money.
You have done it, and good for you. But you are the exception to the rule. I'm sorry if Reality shows your situation in a bad light, but the typical single parent can't make it on their own. The state is the financial provider. "
EX Gila Valley resident wrote on Jul 15, 2009 2:06 AM:
ughh wrote on Jul 15, 2009 2:00 AM:
Read this song and ya Im talking to YOU wrote on Jul 15, 2009 1:27 AM:
So dumb wrote on Jul 15, 2009 1:23 AM:
You people are idiots wrote on Jul 15, 2009 1:21 AM:
Outside Looking In wrote on Jul 14, 2009 8:09 PM:
ba ma mamma wrote on Jul 14, 2009 7:48 PM:
just the facts maam wrote on Jul 14, 2009 5:48 PM:
secure and single wrote on Jul 14, 2009 5:13 PM:
Stephanie wrote on Jul 14, 2009 5:08 PM:
Toni DeBruler-Mata wrote on Jul 14, 2009 3:23 PM:
Exception to the Rule wrote on Jul 14, 2009 10:10 AM:
Upset at shirkers wrote on Jul 13, 2009 3:11 PM:
Daphni wrote on Jul 13, 2009 12:07 PM:
#3 If you both die, how can the child claim legal estate rights?
So what if divorce occurs. You can't guarantee anything in life, but you can make good decisions or go ahead, be thoughtless and selfish. "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 13, 2009 1:58 AM:
You are the example of the "Give Me" lifestyle. No sense of responsibility, or pride in your accomplishments, and no idea how to teach those values and morals to their kids.
How do you teach a kid to work hard for what you want in life when you only work hard enough to not get kicked off the current tier of AHCCCS? How do you teach responsibility when Mom lies to the case worker about the roomate that pays half the bills in the house? "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 13, 2009 1:49 AM:
I am all for having things like AHCCCS and Welfare programs, but I want those programs to go to people that didn't put themselves in their own mess.
A divorce and deadbeat dad, abusive husband, laid off and need it until you get a new job. These are all scenarios that I am more than willing to Help.
But the norm is getting pregnant first then worrying about paying for it second. And the child repeats that irresponsible behavior. "
Out of Wedlock Birth Recipe wrote on Jul 12, 2009 8:50 PM:
I agree with Reality Check wrote on Jul 12, 2009 8:44 PM:
Jena wrote on Jul 12, 2009 11:11 AM:
Laura wrote on Jul 11, 2009 2:14 PM:
WhoCares wrote on Jul 11, 2009 10:16 AM:
so..... wrote on Jul 10, 2009 8:27 PM:
so... wrote on Jul 10, 2009 8:17 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Jul 10, 2009 3:29 PM:
Do you really think that kids who get pregnant did not know what condoms are? They aren't going out and having sex without any idea of what can happen by doing it.
What their education has taught them is that Welfare exists. That AHCCCS exists. That the WIC program exists. That DES Daycare exists.
HELLO. If you can't affod healthcare because your job doesn't offer it. DON'T HAVE A KID!!!!! "
Monica wrote on Jul 10, 2009 1:49 PM:
5 years later @ the same company, i have full benefits and i do not receive child support. We've lived this long w/out that support and we're just fine.
Life is not easy and that is something that is not recognized in this day & age.
Values, Respect& Ideals should be touted by the media, instead of the overtly sexual TV shows & the like. "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 10, 2009 11:27 AM:
Why is it that you choose to accept a job with no medical benefits, and then blame your employer for "Causing" you to be on AHCCCS and forcing you to lie about "Household Income" so your "Single Mother" girlfriend can claim to have little or no income and qualify for state health insurance. How is that your employer's fault. Who took the job knowing you have no medical benefits? "
ok. wrote on Jul 9, 2009 11:01 PM:
Real answer to seths question wrote on Jul 9, 2009 3:46 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Jul 9, 2009 1:28 AM:
"...come to the conclusion that unwed mothers are bearing non-productive children that are a burden, then you are indeed in a fantasy world."
Look at the jails. Look at incarcereation rates. Look at repeat offenders for property crimes. There are alot less kids stealing cars that are above that poverty line than below.
And when your parent works 2 jobs but never has enough money to go to the movies, sometimes kids are willing to seek the "Quick Buck" that crime provides. Face it, it is a disadvantage. "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 9, 2009 1:18 AM:
Nobody said poverty or AHCCCS equates to bad kids. It just makes an already tough job even harder.
It's hard to teach a kid to value hard work when you can't afford a toy for doing a good job. Instead you have to depend on hugs and praise and hope that when they see friends at school with a new iPod, they still get the message. Add in the fact that a single working parent is trying to give this praise while juggling multiple jobs. You start with a disadvantage. "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 9, 2009 1:09 AM:
Research Info.
2008 Federal Poverty Level (FPL) $10,400 Year (one person)
AHCCCS requires no more than 100% of the FPL (less than $866.67 month).
If you get 32 hours a week and make $7.50 an hour, you do not qualify.
Sure, people will cheat the system by living together (unwed) and claiming the mother has no income. But they had to LIE on the application about household income. Willingness to lie to get free government handouts isn't exactly examples of good parenting.
Numbers from HHS.gov and HRSA.gov "
boo... wrote on Jul 8, 2009 11:38 PM:
unknown wrote on Jul 8, 2009 6:22 PM:
Answer to Seths question. wrote on Jul 8, 2009 4:57 PM:
LOUSY EDUCATION!! "
To Narrow your attack wrote on Jul 8, 2009 4:36 PM:
Greenlee County resident wrote on Jul 8, 2009 10:42 AM:
LegalWise wrote on Jul 8, 2009 5:40 AM:
WOW wrote on Jul 7, 2009 8:18 PM:
Seth wrote on Jul 7, 2009 3:15 PM:
narrow your attack wrote on Jul 7, 2009 2:35 PM:
To marc wrote on Jul 7, 2009 1:09 PM:
HAHA wrote on Jul 7, 2009 1:08 PM:
To RU-486 wrote on Jul 7, 2009 1:03 PM:
RU-486 what wrote on Jul 7, 2009 12:54 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Jul 7, 2009 12:06 PM:
Crime is centered around poverty. There is no denying it. It isn't a racial thing like some people try to say. it is poverty. The poorer you are, the more likely you are to chose a life of crime. A person with empty pockets is more likely to steal a soda than a person with $20 in their pocket.
Now explain how 49% of all births born to unwed mothers on AHCCCS isn't starting out with a disadvantage. "
Reality Check wrote on Jul 7, 2009 11:45 AM:
No matter if the mother lives with her boyfriend, or by herself, when 49% of all births are to unwed mothers and paid by AHCCCS, it isn't a good thing. "
What if... wrote on Jul 7, 2009 11:10 AM:
LegalWise wrote on Jul 7, 2009 5:44 AM:
The Truth wrote on Jul 6, 2009 10:06 PM:
whatever wrote on Jul 6, 2009 1:35 AM:
oh geez... wrote on Jul 6, 2009 1:31 AM:
I agree with RU486 wrote on Jul 5, 2009 7:54 PM:
RU-486 for men wrote on Jul 5, 2009 11:51 AM:
RU-486 for men wrote on Jul 5, 2009 11:50 AM:
RU-486 for men wrote on Jul 5, 2009 11:49 AM:
RU-486 for men wrote on Jul 5, 2009 11:47 AM:
LDS Man wrote on Jul 2, 2009 7:59 PM:
Single mother wrote on Jul 2, 2009 3:59 PM:
Morenci Boy wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:18 AM:
cnn.com/2009/LIVING/07/02/sears.family.divorce/index.html?iref=mpstoryview
to access what I feel is a very insightful article about divorce, unwed parents and the diminishing value of fatherhood in the United States. "
traditional family wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:53 AM:
stupid wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:51 AM:
this is stupid wrote on Jul 1, 2009 1:01 PM:
Moved from Safford wrote on Jun 30, 2009 12:28 PM:
This is stupid wrote on Jun 28, 2009 11:16 PM:
blah blah blah wrote on Jun 27, 2009 2:05 PM:
addisondewitt wrote on Jun 25, 2009 5:27 PM:
real problem wrote on Jun 25, 2009 11:04 AM:
Happily married father of two wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:23 AM:
Happily married father of two wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:19 AM:
Stephanie wrote on Jun 23, 2009 9:11 PM:
To Fed_Up wrote on Jun 23, 2009 10:57 AM:
Think wrote on Jun 22, 2009 7:05 PM:
confused wrote on Jun 22, 2009 2:51 PM:
to think wrote on Jun 22, 2009 2:45 PM:
sundevil wrote on Jun 22, 2009 1:45 PM:
Think wrote on Jun 22, 2009 10:51 AM:
happy wrote on Jun 21, 2009 10:28 PM:
i work full time and so does my bf we have a healthy fam so all you people dont assume the worst of us women who choose not to get married b4 we have kids. thats our choice "
Crusty wrote on Jun 20, 2009 9:27 PM:
OMG wrote on Jun 20, 2009 5:00 PM:
Shaesca wrote on Jun 20, 2009 12:21 PM:
LegalWise wrote on Jun 20, 2009 9:30 AM:
guilty consciecne wrote on Jun 19, 2009 2:27 PM:
To duh wrote on Jun 19, 2009 10:57 AM:
To DUH wrote on Jun 19, 2009 10:55 AM:
Duhh wrote on Jun 19, 2009 8:27 AM:
Uh, I don't know of many high school kids that are married. So wouldn't that make their children be born out of wedlock. Duhh! "
Dee wrote on Jun 19, 2009 8:13 AM:
Too quick to judge once again wrote on Jun 18, 2009 9:26 PM:
Too Quick to judge wrote on Jun 18, 2009 9:21 PM:
married wrote on Jun 18, 2009 8:54 PM:
Single mom wrote on Jun 18, 2009 4:24 PM:
It goes both ways wrote on Jun 18, 2009 2:17 PM:
Dirty Laundry wrote on Jun 18, 2009 12:59 PM:
sick and tired wrote on Jun 18, 2009 11:55 AM:
impressed wrote on Jun 18, 2009 10:50 AM:
amazed wrote on Jun 18, 2009 10:44 AM:
Melissa Price wrote on Jun 18, 2009 9:56 AM:
marc wrote on Jun 18, 2009 9:18 AM:
wow wrote on Jun 18, 2009 9:11 AM:
Thank You wrote on Jun 18, 2009 8:56 AM:
Therefore it is a financial incentive to not be wed. As a personal opinion, to the unwed, a marriage license represents responsibility and commitment. Thus if it their cohabitation is "stinky", they can walk away at anytime. Fear of commitment isn't that what it's all about. "
Get a Job wrote on Jun 18, 2009 6:54 AM:
John wrote on Jun 18, 2009 5:54 AM:
John wrote on Jun 18, 2009 5:46 AM:
sick and tired wrote on Jun 17, 2009 11:34 PM:
amen wrote on Jun 17, 2009 8:13 PM:
Check the Facts wrote on Jun 17, 2009 7:48 PM:
out-of-wedlock wrote on Jun 17, 2009 4:16 PM:
Dave wrote on Jun 17, 2009 3:34 PM:
amen wrote on Jun 17, 2009 3:27 PM:
Well said Eldon wrote on Jun 17, 2009 3:14 PM:
FED_UP wrote on Jun 17, 2009 2:01 PM:
AH wrote on Jun 17, 2009 11:29 AM: