As a native Arizonan whose family has been in the Gila Valley for more than 125 years, it has always irritated me when someone moves to Arizona and begins to want things changed to be more like they were from whence they came. This has especially been the case when some legislator or lobbyist wants to do something as they do it in California — or more correctly, The Peoples' Republic of California.
But folks come from elsewhere as well, and some of those folks want to impress their liberal beliefs and philosophies upon people who don't share those beliefs and philosophies. Such a person is Rudy Dalpra.
It's ironic that Mr. Dalpra should criticize someone writing from other than the Gila Valley. That's because he can fairly be considered as much a resident of Michigan as of the Gila Valley, spending, by his own admission, a great deal of time commuting to and from and in his hometown of Crystal Falls, Mich.
Therefore, when he refers to Jon Kyl as "our own senator," I wonder from whose viewpoint he's talking. I have known Jon Kyl for more than 40 years, since college and law school at the U of A. I have worked with him on a number of legal and civic matters.
He is a man of unimpeachable integrity, chosen by Time Magazine and one of America's 10 Best Senators and is currently serving as assistant minority leader in the Senate, the second-most powerful Republican leadership position and the highest-ranking Arizonan in Congress.
Mr. Dalpra's "observations" in his letter should be seen for what they are: the radical rant-ings of someone whose ignorance of our existing health-care and legal systems would result in a plan that would put government in charge of everything, including regulation of doctors and the doctor-patient relationship, as well as a government-controlled malpractice system.
And as far as placing effective limits on medical-malpractice awards, the bill passed by the House provides in Section 2531 for incentive payments to states that provide “an alternative medical liability law” that prevents or prompts “fair resolution” of disputes but also provides that no such incentive will be paid to any state that limits “attorneys’ fees or imposes caps on damages.”
Sincerely,
Brent F. Moody
Phoenix



Comments
29 comment(s)AN INDIAN WHO DOESNT BRAG ABOUT HER ANCESTORS LANDS BECAUSE WERE NOT ALLOWED TO BRAG LIKE YOU wrote on Dec 2, 2009 12:24 PM:
Russ wrote on Nov 24, 2009 10:30 PM:
Norm wrote on Nov 24, 2009 10:21 AM:
Yes, Mr. Dalpra, we Are Radicals!
We are the sort of folks who created
not only Arizona but this Great Nation.
Personally, I am, though 'only' an
Arizonian for half a century, I am Proud! "
Citizen Kane wrote on Nov 23, 2009 2:31 PM:
It evolves like this... Liberal into socialist into progressive into communist. Its a continuum.
True Democrats are much like John F. Kennedy and a lot less like Teddy Kennedy. "
Big Govt bad wrote on Nov 23, 2009 2:58 AM:
OldSchool wrote on Nov 23, 2009 2:27 AM:
Not a Hillbilly wrote on Nov 22, 2009 12:42 PM:
Hillbilly wrote on Nov 20, 2009 1:20 PM:
Keep ranting Rudy wrote on Nov 20, 2009 11:05 AM:
Not so, the seeds were already sown! "
To JC Jones... wrote on Nov 20, 2009 9:45 AM:
generationexer wrote on Nov 20, 2009 8:21 AM:
JC Jones wrote on Nov 20, 2009 7:07 AM:
JC Jones wrote on Nov 19, 2009 11:10 PM:
Brent Moody wrote on Nov 19, 2009 7:59 PM:
PimaTwo wrote on Nov 19, 2009 9:34 AM:
The left has made such an effort in this illusion that they actually beleive things are good and getting better.
This all started way back when Mr Bill Clinton lost the entire Dem held congress and by a REAL landslide to boot.
Then the Dems started their work to regain CONTROL, CONTROL,CONTROL.
President Obama always says he makes good descsions well good for him that's for sure. "
Richey wrote on Nov 19, 2009 7:45 AM:
Richey wrote on Nov 19, 2009 7:43 AM:
Jay Rasco wrote on Nov 19, 2009 6:00 AM:
pro·gres·sive (pr-grsv) KEY
ADJECTIVE:
Moving forward; advancing.
Proceeding in steps; continuing steadily by increments: progressive change.
Promoting or favoring progress toward better conditions or new policies, ideas, or methods: a progressive politician; progressive business leadership.
Progressive Of or relating to a Progressive Party "
Jay Rasco wrote on Nov 19, 2009 5:56 AM:
ADJECTIVE: 1a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded. c. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism. d. Liberal Of, designating, or characteristic of a political party founded on or associated with principles of social and political liberalism, especially in Great Britain, Canada, and the United States. liberally, liberalness
Additional references: American Heritage® Spanish Dictionary, Columbia Encyclopedia "
Russ wrote on Nov 19, 2009 12:29 AM:
JC Jones wrote on Nov 18, 2009 10:50 PM:
JC Jones wrote on Nov 18, 2009 10:04 PM:
Shaesca wrote on Nov 18, 2009 9:42 PM:
AZ wrote on Nov 18, 2009 8:42 PM:
To jay wrote on Nov 18, 2009 5:02 PM:
Jay Rasco wrote on Nov 18, 2009 3:43 PM:
Maybe that attitude is why growth has been so slow here in the Gila Valley.
If wnats want the economy to be such that ones offspring can stay in the area even the Gila valley must move forward. "
Rudy Dalpra wrote on Nov 18, 2009 3:15 PM:
Mr. Moody
Mr. Moody
Mr. Moody
Mr. Moody
There, that even's the score.
Those who read my original letter might want to compare its reasoned critique of the right wing operatives, to the rantings of the ever vigilant Brent, whose incoherent rebuttals are becoming legend among the Courier's faithful. "
Richey wrote on Nov 18, 2009 3:09 PM:
National health care is a joke. Name one thing the government takes over that either runs smoother or costs less.. You can't because it does not happen. I challenge Mr Dalpra or anyone to answer that question. "
Jay Rasco wrote on Nov 18, 2009 11:41 AM: