Let's say there are two students. Student A studies diligently and earns 100 percent on the mid-term test, while student B, not applying himself, earns 60 percent. The socialistic-minded instructor thinks, “If the two scores are averaged, then both students will pass, and student B will feel better." So they each receive 80 percent.
Student A thinks, “If the best I get is 80 percent, that is what I will work for." Student B thinks, “Why study at all? Student A will earn enough for both of us,” so he earns 30 percent on the final. The resulting average is 55 percent; both fail.
Ridiculous? Yes, but it’s happening with our wealth. This simplistic analogy points out two characteristics of human nature; if the reward for effort is taken away, incentive lessens. When one’s needs are freely provided, incentive to produce is also lessened.
Spreading the wealth — by the government — is a lose-lose plan in that most everyone loses some incentive to be productive. The winners are politicians who use taxes to buy votes and build up supporting bureaucracies.
There is no hope for socialized medicine being a success. As history shows, more and more people will take advantage of the system, demanding more comprehensive service — to the delight of many bureaucrats and politicians.
An example is the House’s 2,000-page health bill that is beyond the comprehension of its creators. Fraud, corruption and bureaucratic complexity will increase — creating unlimited opportunities for crooks!
To illustrate: In 1966, the national Medicare cost was $3 billion; in 2008, Medicare and Medicaid cost more than $700 billion. Here in Graham County in 2008, $2,556,706 in property taxes was collected, while the county spent $2,308,000 for the health and defense care of indigents, essentially a trade-off. This was in addition to what the state spent.
Helping those who can’t help themselves (disabled, elderly, handicapped, orphans, etc.) is humane, but helping those who could meet their own needs but don’t is inhumane because it destroys the human spirit.
We are becoming government-dependent beggars. The only solution is for the government to do much less, requiring citizens to do more for themselves.
“A government big enough to give you everything you want is strong enough to take everything you have.”—Thomas Jefferson
Eldon Angle
Safford



Comments
10 comment(s)AKA Dora wrote on Dec 8, 2009 12:05 PM:
Russ wrote on Nov 9, 2009 4:16 PM:
Not Good Enough wrote on Nov 9, 2009 3:48 PM:
However, when certain congressmen were asked the same question, they replied that the "Kennedy Health Care Plan" would exempt them from the new universal plan if enacted.
So, it's good enough for us but not good enough for the boys and girls on The Hill. "
MAZAZ wrote on Nov 9, 2009 3:04 PM:
Insurance companies have become the cash cow ... provide little for their coverage while insuring their CEO's reap the $$$ for themselves.
Who continues to vote the do nothing politicians into office ... yes we do, and what do they provide us? NOTHING
Prime example of Arizona do-nothing politicians can be said in two words ... Kyl and McCain. "
Russ wrote on Nov 9, 2009 2:44 PM:
jms wrote on Nov 9, 2009 6:32 AM:
Pat wrote on Nov 9, 2009 5:45 AM:
Free Money wrote on Nov 8, 2009 11:18 PM:
For most of the past thirty or forty years the government has created programs which require taking taxes from those who pay and then given to those who don't.
Of course if a tax paying individual doesn't wish to participate in this so-called "voluntary compliance" tax program, then he is immediately branded a "tax protester" while the person receiving the free money is considered "disadvantage."
Same scenario in universal health care. "
teachers dont grade like that wrote on Nov 8, 2009 6:49 PM:
I guess you can make up any kind of B.S. to justify looking down your nose at those less fortunate than you,
you have yours so why help others.
what if student A was born out of wedlock and student B was on foodstamps then the teacher BLA BLA
the ansewer you get is IF A FROG HAD WINGS BE WOULDNT BUMP HIS BUTT WHEN HE HOPS "
Rudy Dalpra wrote on Nov 8, 2009 4:40 PM:
On the other hand there is a great need for a more universal access to health care. Unfortunately, the industries that provide it have proven themselves to be a big part of the problem, taking advantage of the desperation of those in need of medical services of various kinds, to price themselves virtually out of the market for many people. "