Bryce said Thursday he did nothing wrong and followed procedures that have been in place for many years.
The report does not accuse Bryce of theft or any other crime. Instead, it is critical of a bookkeeping system that allowed Bryce and other officials liberal use of college credit cards. Bryce was the only official named in the report, which covers the five-year period of 2003 through 2008.
A complaint to the auditor general in October 2008 brought to light Bryce’s use of the credit card for buying meals for himself and others, including EAC Governing Board members.
“As a result of our review, we determined that the (college) district has made improper loans of credit and public monies to the president totaling at least $7,402 and allowed him to spend over $16,000 in violation of district policy, $4,000 of which may have been a gift of public monies to himself and other district officials,” the audit report states.
The report shows that Bryce used his college credit card to purchase airfare for his wife or children on eight separate occasions.
“On six occasions, these family airfare tickets were purchased more than 30 days in advance of the travel,” the report states. “Furthermore, on six of these trips, (Bryce) used the district credit card for additional travel expenses, such as family meals and spa services.”
Bryce said he used the college credit card to book family trips because he wanted to be sure all family members would be on the same flight. Also, he chose certain flights because of reduced fares and asked an employee to make the arrangements.
According to Bryce, there was never any intent to misuse his college credit card, and he did not hesitate to reimburse the college.
“I promptly paid when I was asked to do so,” Bryce said.
The repayment period ranged from two to 151 days, according to Davenport’s report. Bryce contends the delay was because he was not notified promptly, not because he put off repaying the college.
The auditor general’s office, however, views this practice as a “loan of public monies” — a practice that continued from January 2003 through October 2008. A description of the personal “loans” and the number of days that passed before payment follows:
• Airfare and conference registration for wife, phone calls, gym and spa fees — $679.94, 151 days outstanding.
• Airfare for wife — $221.30, 114 days outstanding.
• Airfare for wife, meals and rental car — $497.53, 113 days outstanding.
• Airfare for wife, three extra nights at hotel, three extra days of rental car use, a movie and spa services — $1,511.14, 85 days outstanding.
• Airfare and travel agency service fee for wife — $396, 53 days outstanding.
• Airfare for wife and gift shop merchandise — $169.51, 51 days outstanding.
• Airfare for wife and two children and meals — $1,926.83, 44 days outstanding.
• Airfare for wife and gift shop merchandise — $560.40, 21 days outstanding.
• Personal expenses such as meals and movies on 15 additional trips — $1,440.07. The number of days outstanding ranged from two to 62 days.
The report states EAC policies prohibit the use of credit cards for food purchases.
“District policy strictly prohibits credit cards from being used for meals or food at any time. However, during the time period reviewed, (Bryce) used his district credit card to pay for food on 212 separate occasions, spending approximately $16,300,” the report states.
The report also states about $4,000 was for local meals for himself, college employees, governing board members and “possibly others.”
According to the report, employees will only be reimbursed for meals when they are traveling 35 miles away on official business. Under certain circumstances, meals will be paid for at official local functions.
“There was insufficient documentation to determine whether these local meals served a public purpose or whether they were connected to an authorized official function,” the report states.
Bryce disagrees, saying there is no policy against using credit cards for food purchases. There is, however, a guideline, which was given to state auditors to explain the college’s practice of food purchases.
Tim Curtis, EAC’s chief business officer, agrees with Bryce.
“What I gave them was a guideline I give to (employees). It’s not a policy,” Curtis said.
According to Bryce, the intent of the guideline is to prohibit certain employees, such as maintenance workers, from using a college credit card to buy groceries on the way to a hardware store to buy parts.
Employees who travel out of town to represent EAC at conferences are allowed to use their college credit card for meals, Bryce said.
He said meals must be purchased for athletic teams and other student groups when they travel.
The college president also said it is reasonable for a college official who is traveling to be able to use a college credit card to buy meals.
On March 10, the EAC Governing Board clarified its policies related to business expenses and procedures, including the purchase of food.
“It has always been and shall continue to be the policy of the Governing Board of the Graham County Community College District (EAC) that the college’s executive level employees, including the president, are authorized to purchase food and pay for meals and incidentals by check, cash, college purchasing/credit card or otherwise as they travel or otherwise carry out district business and activities deemed by them to be in the best interest of the district, and they have the authority to authorize other employees to do likewise,” Section 1 of the resolution states.
The audit also states more than $13,000 in purchases were not supported by itemized receipts. About $10,000 of those purchases involved food.
Section 3 of the EAC Governing Board’s resolution addresses documentation.
“The board reminds all college employees that they must maintain appropriate documentation for all business expenses. Such documentation includes, but is not limited to, original receipts showing line-item detail.
The board may, in its discretion, direct the college to refuse to reimburse expenses that are not supported by appropriate documentation.”
Although Bryce contends he did nothing wrong and followed long-standing procedures, the college president said Thursday college officials will seek advice from the auditor general’s office.
“We’re asking, ‘please help us to improve,’ ” Bryce said during an interview Thursday in his office.
To help the college improve, Davenport recommended the following actions:
• Require Bryce to make personal purchases with his own money.
• The college should refuse to pay for unallowable expenditures, including personal purchases.
• Require original receipts for all purchases.
• Require that all college employees, including Bryce, to conform to the college’s established travel policies.



Comments
56 comment(s)Dear Courier and Community wrote on Apr 5, 2010 9:20 PM:
HMMMMM wrote on Apr 2, 2010 1:20 PM:
Am I Missing Something wrote on Mar 30, 2010 1:48 PM:
christian wrote on Mar 29, 2010 3:48 PM:
To this too shall pass wrote on Mar 20, 2010 3:08 PM:
This too shall pass wrote on Mar 19, 2010 9:00 PM:
To Policy wrote on Mar 19, 2010 8:05 PM:
Company card holder wrote on Mar 19, 2010 7:56 PM:
State Employee wrote on Mar 17, 2010 11:19 PM:
State Employee wrote on Mar 17, 2010 11:12 PM:
Heck of a Attorney wrote on Mar 17, 2010 8:03 PM:
whinny employees wrote on Mar 17, 2010 12:45 PM:
If you don't like working there leave! "
Ripped OFF wrote on Mar 17, 2010 12:44 PM:
no fault wrote on Mar 17, 2010 12:42 PM:
Sounds like everyone involved is guilty except President Bryce. " "
bloo blee blaa wrote on Mar 17, 2010 12:33 PM:
Ft Thomas is SMART wrote on Mar 17, 2010 8:52 AM:
Recall the board wrote on Mar 17, 2010 1:47 AM:
Bryce is paid a lot of money wrote on Mar 17, 2010 1:44 AM:
The real headline should read wrote on Mar 17, 2010 1:36 AM:
Faculty says wrote on Mar 17, 2010 1:33 AM:
he runs at the college. He has the board in his pocket. The AG has just started to find out about his behavior and activity. The Citizens need to stand up nowand make the board act to remove Bryce. His miss use of power and now money points that he should go. "
What should hppen wrote on Mar 17, 2010 1:30 AM:
SPA wrote on Mar 16, 2010 8:12 PM:
Teacher wrote on Mar 16, 2010 5:28 PM:
Really Mr.Bryce wrote on Mar 16, 2010 12:19 PM:
Public Information wrote on Mar 16, 2010 10:35 AM:
Stick to your guns wrote on Mar 16, 2010 10:15 AM:
The best way for you to show that you've done nothing wrong is to continue your same practice of usage of EAC credit cards. The guidelines are in place now as they were before. Don't give in to public pressure. Follow the same procedures that have been in place for years.
If you change your habits and follow the recommendations of the auditor, then you are admitting that these practices were not appropriate. STICK TO YOUR GUNS! DON'T GIVE IN! "
EAC Employee wrote on Mar 16, 2010 8:24 AM:
Curious wrote on Mar 15, 2010 9:54 PM:
How rude wrote on Mar 15, 2010 9:38 PM:
citizen wrote on Mar 15, 2010 5:35 PM:
citizen wrote on Mar 15, 2010 5:22 PM:
So there is no proof that purchases of more than $13000 was even work related. What conscientious public employee would spend that kind of money and not turn in a receipt? And what conscientious Board would allow that? It all sounds pretty fishy to me. I think the Governing Board members need to be held accountable too. They let Bryce do anything he wants because of the perks they get. Everybody's back gets scratched at taxpayers expense. "
To No Crime wrote on Mar 15, 2010 4:17 PM:
Is it true wrote on Mar 15, 2010 12:19 PM:
To take a closer look wrote on Mar 15, 2010 12:05 PM:
If the Colleges NET assets increasd by 7.4 million dollars last year, why are we still being required by the College Board to pay the highest local property tax rates in the State to support EAC? "
Im faculty wrote on Mar 15, 2010 11:57 AM:
The current issue is just a public manifestation of this caliber of leadership and just a tiny portion of the problems that currently simmer just below the public level at EAC. "
Steve wrote on Mar 15, 2010 10:45 AM:
Full Report wrote on Mar 15, 2010 10:29 AM:
No crime wrote on Mar 15, 2010 10:23 AM:
People in the County can be and are prosecuted for felonies that involve less than $500. This crime inovlved much, much more, and involved public money. "
Please wrote on Mar 15, 2010 10:13 AM:
Closer look at AG reports wrote on Mar 15, 2010 10:11 AM:
policy wrote on Mar 15, 2010 9:59 AM:
Nothing will happen wrote on Mar 15, 2010 8:23 AM:
So unless we're willing to recall the Board (not likely) or Kenny Angle prosecute (not likely) we should drop this issue so more innocent people don't get hurt by the alledgedly guilty parties. "
Bookkeeping System wrote on Mar 15, 2010 8:12 AM:
A Voice of Reason wrote on Mar 15, 2010 7:21 AM:
matter of opinion wrote on Mar 15, 2010 5:30 AM:
Fred wrote on Mar 14, 2010 10:55 PM:
Why is it that Bryce is allowed this luxury? How much money has he failed to reimburse EAC for his personal expenses?
He gets paid enough money that he should pay for his personal purchases out of his own pocket. I wonder if he has reported this as income to the IRS? "
Doesnt add up wrote on Mar 14, 2010 9:29 PM:
Concerned wrote on Mar 14, 2010 8:17 PM:
Citizen wrote on Mar 14, 2010 8:12 PM:
Funny wrote on Mar 14, 2010 7:14 PM:
Finaly wrote on Mar 14, 2010 7:06 PM:
Questions wrote on Mar 14, 2010 6:43 PM:
Mr. Bryce can't substantiate the $13,000 in expenses which would be considered abuse for using the credit card for unauthorized uses which in turn is theft. Why didn't he use his own personal credit card for family? He knew he incurred a debt but had to be told when to pay come on! FIRE HIM! "
Staff at fault wrote on Mar 14, 2010 1:43 PM:
Sounds like everyone involved is guilty except President Bryce. "
jw wrote on Mar 14, 2010 1:36 PM:
No crime wrote on Mar 14, 2010 1:36 PM:
Publish full report wrote on Mar 14, 2010 1:34 PM: