The Arizona Medical Marijuana Act allows state-issued cardholders to possess up to 2.5 ounces of cannabis every two weeks. Patients in the Gila Valley have their driving privileges revoked, however, over what appears to either be an issue of semantics or of government officials simply ignoring a law passed by the residents of Arizona because they do not agree with it.

The AMMA protects patients from discrimination regarding housing and employment. When it comes to driving with the metabolite in a person's system, however, local law enforcement will not apply the same rules as it does in regard to prescription medication and will issue a citation for DUI-drug even if there is no impairment to the driver, thus breaking the spirit of the new law.

Arizona is one of nine states that sanction drivers from operating a motorized vehicle if they have a detectable level of a controlled substance or its metabolites in their bodily fluids.

According to the Arizona Revised Statute 28-1381, it is unlawful for a person to drive a vehicle while under the influence of any drug, or combination of liquor and/or drugs if the person is impaired to the slightest degree, or while there is any drug defined in section 13-3401 or its metabolite in the person's body. The list of drugs defined includes illicit and prescription-only drugs.

Law enforcement in the Gila Valley, including the Arizona Depart-ment of Public Safety, has chosen to ignore placing any medical value to cannabis and will issue a medical marijuana cardholder a DUI-drug citation simply upon admission of using the drug, no matter if the last time a person used it was more than a week ago and could not possibly be driving under its influence.

"If they have marijuana in their system, they ought not to be driving," Graham County Sheriff P.J. Allred said.

The Graham County Attorney's office supports this stand because the patients receive their state-issued cards on the basis of a doctor's recommendation and not a prescription. Doctors can only recommend medical marijuana and not give a prescription because the federal government lists marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug with no accepted medical use. Because of the wording, Graham County prosecutors hold the opinion that it is a strict liability offense, which means if a person drives in the state of Arizona with a cannabis metabolite in his/her system, that individual has committed a DUI-drug offense regardless of whether the suspect has a medical marijuana card.  

Persons holding a prescription for a drug, including powerful opiates like Oxycodone and morphine, are excluded from prosecution of a DUI-drug merely by having the drug or its metabolite in their system, and prosecutors must show impairment for a conviction. Local defense attorneys are of the opinion that the same law should apply to medical marijuana cardholders because the doctor is essentially prescribing them cannabis to use as medication even if they are bound by federal law to call it a recommendation. Defense attorneys argue that having a card is an affirmative defense, and the state would have to show that the drug actually impaired a suspect's driving.

As cases begin to be litigated through the system, it appears that the issue will have to be settled through the Court of Appeals and the Arizona Supreme Court. Until then, patients with medical marijuana cards take the risk of being arrested for a DUI-drug every time they operate a motor vehicle.

(5) comments


"Arizona is one of nine states that sanction drivers from operating a motorized vehicle if they have a detectable level of a controlled substance or its metabolites in their bodily fluids."

Pray tell, what are the other 41 that manage to get along without such a protocol? They seem to have a firmer grasp of reality than Arizona. Listen, just because a person ingested marijuana at home after work doesn't mean he is unfit to drive the next day. According to a Safford cop, such a person is unfit to drive for 30 days! (Which is total malarkey/injustice.)


The only "hazy" thing going on is what's happening in the minds of the arresting officers! I'm thinking these LEO have been smokin something too. The teat of power maybe?


It's just a shame there was no challenger on the ballot for sherriff this fall. THE YOUAUGHTNOTO degenerate that seems to think hes is above the law of arizona voters who passed this bill to enable the use of mmj, more than likely has absolutely no knawledge whatsoever of the product and 100% natural plant, That was only and simply banned from planet earth in the 1930s because the pharmaceuticle cos. started creating poisionous chemicals to TREAT


I wasn't done yet. If you simply do the research on the plant, you will absolutely discover that this plant simply cures over 95% of all diseases and other ailments. BAR NONE AND FEW.That is why it has been totaly removed from society , WORLD WIDE....The evidence is clear that they do not want you to be disease free. That would make you live longer and you would become of the useless eaters as the govt. describes us. wake up !!!!!! and so you know, I DON'T EVEN USE THE STUFF.


@ sidewinder: Cures 95% of all diseases and other ailments? Your hyperbole renders your comments flaccid.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.